Being caught with drugs, especially for the first time, can be a deeply distressing and frightening experience. Many individuals dealing with this situation often find themselves overwhelmed with thoughts of potential jail time, damage to their reputation, and how this could influence their future and employment.

However, understanding your rights and potential outcomes is crucial in making sure you navigate your situation with knowledge and confidence. The court system can be complex and unfamiliar for first-time offenders, so understanding the process is important to reduce anxiety and participate confidently in your defence.

In this guide, we’ll explore the different ways you can avoid conviction if charged with drug possession for the first time.

‍

Introduction to Drug Possession Charges

Drug possession charges in New South Wales (NSW) arise when an individual is found in possession of illegal drugs, also known as prohibited substances. These charges are taken seriously by the legal system, as drug offences can have significant consequences, including fines, imprisonment, and the risk of a criminal record. The legal process for drug possession charges considers several factors, such as the quantity of the drug, the type of substance involved, and whether the person is a first-time offender or has a history of drug offences.

For first-time offenders, the NSW legal system often provides more lenient penalties, recognising that a single mistake should not necessarily define a person’s future. Options such as a conditional release order or a Section 10 dismissal may be available, allowing individuals to avoid a criminal record and the long-term impact it can have on employment and travel opportunities. However, those who are repeat offenders or are involved in more serious drug offences, such as drug supply or trafficking, may face much harsher penalties, including life imprisonment. Understanding the legal process and your rights is essential to achieving the best possible outcome if you are facing a drug possession charge.

‍

What Is Drug Possession?

Drug possession in NSW, as defined by the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), involves having a prohibited drug under one’s immediate physical custody in which a person can have practise exclusive control, irrespective of the intent for personal use or distribution.

The Act classifies drug possession as a punishable offence with a maximum sentence of 2 years or a fine of up to $2200. While the penalties may seem harsh, courts typically view first-time offences differently from repeated offences. The severity of the penalty often depends on the nature of the crime committed, with more serious offences attracting harsher consequences. A clean record prior to the charge can be viewed more leniently, especially if there are no other aggravating factors involved.

‍

Penalties for Drug Offences

The penalties for drug offences in NSW vary widely depending on the nature and seriousness of the offence. For minor drug possession charges, the court may impose fines or more lenient penalties such as a conditional release order, particularly for first-time offenders. These options are designed to give individuals the opportunity to address their drug misuse without the burden of a criminal conviction. However, for more serious drug offences, such as drug supply or drug trafficking, the penalties can be much harsher, including lengthy terms of imprisonment and, in the most severe cases, life imprisonment.

The legal system in NSW recognises the importance of rehabilitation and offers alternatives to traditional sentencing, such as drug diversion programs. These programs aim to address the underlying issues of drug addiction and help individuals avoid reoffending. Participation in a drug diversion program can sometimes result in a more favourable outcome, allowing offenders to demonstrate their commitment to change and potentially avoid a criminal conviction. Ultimately, the court will consider the circumstances of each case, including the individual’s history, the quantity of drugs involved, and any steps taken towards rehabilitation, when determining the appropriate penalty.

‍

Court Process for First-Time Drug Possession Charges

If you are facing a first-time drug possession charge in NSW, the legal process typically begins with a court attendance notice or summons, requiring you to appear in court on a specified date. At your court appearance, you will have the opportunity to plead guilty or not guilty to the charge. If you choose to plead guilty, the court will consider a range of factors, including the sentencing guidelines, your personal circumstances, and any evidence of remorse or rehabilitation, to determine the most appropriate sentence.

For those who plead not guilty, the matter will proceed to a hearing, where the prosecution must prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Throughout this process, having an experienced drug lawyer by your side can be invaluable. Your lawyer can help you prepare character references, apology letters, and other supporting documents to present your case in the best possible light. They can also advise you on the likelihood of receiving a lenient sentence, such as a conditional release order or section 10 dismissal, and guide you through each step of the legal process. By taking proactive steps and seeking expert legal advice, first-time drug offenders can often achieve a more favourable outcome and minimise the long-term impact of a drug possession charge.

‍

‍

How to Avoid Jail Time as a First-Time Offender for Drug Possession

Does being a first-timer make a difference? In fact, it does! Section 21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999), (3e) lists the mitigating factors courts must take into consideration whilst sentencing. This includes ‘the offender does not have any record (or significant record) of previous convictions. ’ Courts also consider personal factors such as age, health, family responsibilities, employment status, and prior criminal record when determining an appropriate sentence.

Here are 8 different methods that will help first-time drug possession offenders avoid conviction:

1. Pursuing drug diversion/drug court programs
2. Actively engaging in rehabilitation
3. Securing a section 10 dismissal
4. Securing a conditional release order
5. Submitting an apology letter to the court
6. Presenting character references
7. Entering a timely guilty plea/Early guilty plea
8. Seek professional legal help

‍

PURSUING DRUG DIVERSION/DRUG COURT PROGRAMS

In NSW, drug diversion programs serve as an alternative to traditional punitive measures often associated with drug offences. Instead of imprisonment, individuals are referred to specialised programs designed to address the root causes of drug dependence.

Another alternative to imprisonment for less serious offences is a community corrections order, which focuses on rehabilitation and community reintegration.

A common program run by courts is the MERIT program, available to people charged in the Local Court, which aids offenders to break the cycle of problematic drug and/or alcohol use.

‍

ACTIVELY ENGAGING IN REHABILITATION

Taking proactive steps towards rehabilitation, such as enrolling in counselling sessions or joining support groups, speaks volumes about an individual's commitment to change. Courts in NSW often view this proactive stance favourably.

By addressing the issues leading to the offence head-on, individuals not only benefit personally but also demonstrate to the court their dedication to becoming responsible community members.

‍

SECURING A SECTION 10 DISMISSAL

Section 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999) is a powerful tool for first-time offenders. It allows the court to find an individual guilty but dismiss the charges without recording a conviction (meaning the person is found guilty, but no conviction is recorded). This means you can leave the courtroom criminal record free and avoid negatively impacting future employment or travel opportunities.

Such a dismissal is more likely given for minor offences, where the individual shows genuine remorse, and where a criminal record would be disproportionately detrimental given the circumstances of the offence.

‍

SECURING CONDITIONAL RELEASE ORDERS

A Conditional Release Order is an alternative to full-time imprisonment. While under a CRO, individuals must adhere to specific conditions set by the court, which might include regular check-ins with authorities, mandatory drug tests, or participation in rehabilitation programs.

These orders emphasise reform and allow for individuals to serve their sentence within the community. This penalty is more attainable when certain factors are considered, such as the defendant being a first-time offender. There is also the option available to the court to sentence a person with a non-conviction CRO, meaning the person completes their sentence whilst avoiding a criminal record.

‍

SUBMITTING AN APOLOGY LETTER TO COURT

Expressing genuine remorse can be a significant factor during sentencing. An apology letter allows the offender to acknowledge their wrongdoing and convey their commitment to change. A well-written, sincere apology can show the Judge the individual's understanding of the consequences of their actions, potentially influencing a more lenient sentence.

‍

PRESENTING CHARACTER REFERENCES

Character references provide the court with a broader understanding of the individual outside of the offence in question. These letters are often written by employers, family members, or community leaders, and can paint a picture of the individual's character, work ethic, and community involvement.

A strong character reference can sway the court's perception, especially if it attests to the offender's remorse and likelihood of not reoffending.

‍

ENTERING A TIMELY GUILTY PLEA/EARLY GUILTY PLEA

Admitting guilt at an early stage can result in a reduced sentence. Pleading guilty early in the process can significantly influence sentencing outcomes and the course of court proceedings, as it demonstrates cooperation and may prompt the court to consider a more lenient penalty. An early guilty plea not only eases the court’s burden by avoiding a full-blown trial but also indicates the offender’s acknowledgment of wrongdoing and willingness to face the consequences.

Frequently, an early guilty plea can lead to a reduced sentence and/or a ‘discount’ on some particular penalties. This demonstration of responsibility and remorse can lead to more lenient sentencing.

‍

SEEK PROFESSIONAL LEGAL HELP

Navigating the legal landscape, especially when faced with drug offences, often requires expert guidance. Retaining a specialised criminal defence lawyer, such as the team at Faraj Defence Lawyers, becomes paramount. Engaging a criminal lawyer when facing drug supply offences can significantly improve your chances of avoiding a criminal record and help you effectively navigate complex legal proceedings.

Ensuring your rights are upheld and that you’re being presented in the best possible light is our mission. Through our in-depth knowledge of the law, coupled with our strategic approach to defence, we maximise the likelihood of a positive outcome. In moments when the stakes are high, the importance of professional legal representation becomes essential.

Book your free consultation by calling us at (02) 8896 6034 or emailing us at af@farajdefencelawyers.com.au.

‍

‍

Potential Defences to First-Time Drug Possession Charges

The key to a favourable outcome often lies in understanding and presenting effective defences tailored to the specific circumstances of a case. These defences allow you to avoid any penalties that may be related to drug possession charges, and as such avoid any conviction.

Here are 6 main defences for those charged with drug possession:

1. Proving lack of knowledge or intent
2. Challenging the legitimacy of the search
3. Questioning the authenticity of the substance
4. Defending minute trace possession
5. Disputing ownership in shared spaces
6. Using necessity/duress defence

‍

PROVING LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR INTENT

If you did not know the drugs were in your possession, this could be a strong defence. The key is to prove the absence of knowledge and intent. If you had no reason to suspect drugs in your possession and no way of knowing they were there, this defence could be used to challenge the prosecution's case.

For example, scenarios such as shared spaces, borrowed items, unexpected substances in gifts and/or even instances where drugs may have been planted maliciously by someone with a motive can make gaps in prosecution's case and can make the lack of knowledge or intent element difficult to establish.

‍

CHALLENGING THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SEARCH

Law enforcement must adhere to strict protocols when conducting searches. If police did not follow correct legal procedures when searching you, your belongings, or property, then any evidence they found may be dismissed in court. In simple terms, if the police didn't have the right to search you but did so anyway, the evidence collected might not be used against you.

‍

QUESTIONING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE SUBSTANCE

Not all substances that appear illicit are illegal drugs. There have been cases where substances believed to be illicit drugs turned out to be negative upon further testing. Laboratory verification is crucial in these scenarios, and without it, charges based on mistaken results of the substance can be challenged. For example, false positives, whilst rare, can happen during on-the-spot drug testing kits, which can lead to wrongful accusations.

‍

DEFENDING MINUTE TRACE POSSESSION

Finding trace amounts of a drug might not always equate to possession for use. In some cases, residual amounts, especially if they're not usable or consumable, can serve as a basis for defence. The argument here focuses on the non-consumable nature of the substance found.

‍

DISPUTING OWNERSHIP IN SHARED SPACES

If prohibited drugs are found in a shared space, establishing unequivocal possession by one individual can make the charge of drug possession difficult. Prohibited drugs which are found in a shared space, such as a ‘communal lounge room', found in the case of R v Filippetti (1978), where everyone living there had proximity and access to it, meaning that anyone living in the house could have been the owner of drugs.

It was found that it is necessary for prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the illicit drugs must have been in a person's 'exclusive physical control.' This can't be proven if multiple people can have access to the same drugs.

‍

USING NECESSITY/DURESS DEFENCE

In rare situations, individuals might possess drugs due to extreme pressure or threats to their safety. While challenging to prove, demonstrating possession under significant duress or out of immediate necessity can serve as a valid defence to the offence of Drug possession.

‍

Can I Be Charged with Anything Else?

While drug possession is a common charge that many individuals face in NSW, it’s crucial to understand that the spectrum of drug-related offences is broader. In addition to simple possession, more severe charges may be applied based on the circumstances surrounding the case. Understanding the various areas of drug offences can help in preparing an effective defence and receiving the best possible outcome.

‍

DEEMED SUPPLY

For example, ‘Deemed Supply' is a possible charge that can be faced by an individual who is found with a quantity of drugs that exceeds the legally defined threshold for personal use. This means that the law assumes an intention to supply even if there is no additional evidence to support the supplying of drugs. This is an offence under Section 29 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW).

‍

DRUG SUPPLY

Section 25 of the Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) makes Drug Supply a punishable offence in NSW. Drug supply is a more serious offence than simple possession. While possession involves having a prohibited substance for personal use, drug supply involves distributing, selling, or administering it to others. Drug use itself is also an offence, but it is treated differently under the law compared to supply. The distinction between the two can often rely on the quantity of the drug in question, with larger amounts potentially implying an intent to supply.

‍