We look forward to helping you in your time of need and assisting you in achieving justice. We know how stressful these times can be therefore, your enquiry will be responded to within the same day.
Being charged with recording an intimate image without consent is a serious offence. This charge involves capturing or distributing private images of someone without their permission, and it can have severe legal consequences. A conviction could not only result in fines or imprisonment but also affect your personal relationships, career, and reputation. The emotional and psychological toll of facing such charges can be overwhelming.
If you are dealing with this situation, you’re likely feeling uncertain and stressed about what to do next. Many people in this position do not know what to do, and this is completely understandable.
At Faraj Defence Lawyers, we understand the seriousness of these charges and have successfully defended many clients in similar circumstances. Our team has extensive experience in handling cases involving intimate images and can provide you with the expert advice and representation you need.
01
We understand the importance of an initial assessment, which is why we offer free consultations to discuss the specifics of your case.
02
We craft meticulous defence strategies aimed at securing favourable outcomes, including aiming and securing Section 10 dismissals & non-convictions.
03
Unwavering support and guidance from the beginning to the resolution of your case, ensuring you are informed and empowered throughout.
04
Our extensive knowledge on dealing with the prosecution has allowed us to develop expert negotiation strategies that will tip the scales in our favour.
05
Direct access to a senior criminal lawyer who will oversee your case. Ensuring your matter is handled with the utmost expertise and attention it deserves.
06
We believe in transparency. Our firm operates on fixed fees, providing clarity on costs from the outset. Eliminating any unexpected financial burdens.
...Transparent from start to finish and I had no doubt in his ability from the start. Definitely recommend and would go to if needed again.
According to section 91P of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), the offence of recording an intimate image without consent involves capturing or distributing explicit images or a person without their permission. This can include images showing nudity, sexual activity, or other intimate acts where the individual would reasonably expect privacy.
The act of recording can take many forms, such as taking photographs, videos, or any other visual of the person involved, often without their knowledge or consent. It is important to note that the offence applies not only to the initial act of recording but also to distributing or sharing the images, such as through social media, text messages, or online platforms.
Examples of how this offence might be committed include:
Secretly recording someone in a private space, like a bedroom or bathroom, without their knowledge.
Distributing an intimate image that was originally consensually but later forwarded without the person’s permission.
Sharing or uploading intimate images of a person to social media platforms or messaging apps without their consent.
These actions are a serious breach of privacy and can result in significant legal consequences under the Crimes Act.
An intimate image refers to any visual depiction, such as photos or videos, that shows a person in a state of nudity, engaged in sexual activity, or in a manner that would reasonably be expected to be private. This definition includes images where the person’s private parts are exposed, or where they are involved in intimate actions typically reserved for private settings.
Under the law, intimate images can also extend to situations where someone has threatened to share such images without consent, even if the image has not yet been distributed. The key factor is the expectation of privacy and consent, if the image was captured or shared without subject’s permission, it may be considered an intimate image under the relevant legal provisions.
In the legal context of intimate images, consent refers to a person’s clear and voluntary agreement to the recording, sharing, or distribution of intimate images involving them. Consent must be informed and freely given, without any form of pressure, coercion, or manipulation.
It is important to emphasise that consent is critical, even if a person has previously agreed to being recorded or photographed in an intimate setting. This does not mean they have given consent for future recordings or for the images to be shared or distributed. Consent must be explicitly given each time an image is captured or shared, and at any point, a person has the right to withdraw their consent. Without this clear and ongoing consent, the act of recording or distributing intimate images may constitute a criminal offence.
In cases involving the offence of recording an intimate image without consent, the legal burden of proof lies with the prosecution. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the offence was committed. That is, that the intimate image was recorded or distributed without the consent of the person involved. If the prosecution cannot meet this high standard of proof, the charge may be challenged or dismissed.
Evidence plays a crucial role in these cases. Faraj Defence Lawyers can carefully examine the evidence presented by the prosecution to determine if it is strong enough to support the charge. If there are weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, there may be valid grounds to challenge the charge.
Some potential defence strategies include:
Lack of Intent: If the recording was made unintentionally or unknowingly, this may serve as a defence. For example, if the image was accidently captured or not intended to be intimate, the defendant may argue there was no criminal intent.
Consent: If the person being recorded had provided consent, this could be a strong defence. It must be shown that the consent was freely given and understood by parties at the time the image was taken or shared.
Mistaken identity or insufficient evidence: if there is doubt about who recorded or distributed image, or if there is insufficient evidence to link the defendant to the offence, a defence may be raised based on mistaken identity or lack of proof.
To secure a conviction for the offence of recording an intimate image without consent, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt several key factors:
The image is intimate: The prosecution must establish that the image depicts the person in a private, intimate context, such as showing nudity, sexual activity or a situation where the individual would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The person in the image did not consent: It must be proven that the person featured in the image did not give their explicit consent for the recording or distribution of the image. Consent must be clear, informed, and voluntary.
The defendant acted knowingly: The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant either recorded, distributed, or threatened to distribute the intimate image knowingly and intentionally, without the person’s consent. If the recording or distribution was accidental or unintentional, this element may not be satisfied.
Under section 91P of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), individuals convicted of recording intimate images without consent can face serious penalties, including fines and imprisonment for up to 3 years in severe cases.
The severity of the penalty depends on several factors including:
Whether the image was merely recorded or distributed.
The harm caused to the victim, such as emotional trauma, embarrassment, or damage to their reputation.
Aggravating factors that can increase the penalty include:
If the images were shared with malicious intent, such as to harm, harass, or embarrass the victim.
If the images were widely distributed online, which can cause significant and lasting harm due to the potential for viral spread.
Given the seriousness of these penalties and the complexities of the law, it is always advisable to consult with an experienced criminal defence lawyer. A skilled lawyer can carefully examine the case, identify possible defences, and work to secure the best possible outcome.
When the victim is under the age of 16, the penalties for recording or distributing intimate images are much harsher. In such cases, the prosecution may pursue additional charges related to child abuse material, which can result in sentences of up to 15 years imprisonment.
Under section 72D of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), it is illegal to create, share, or possess intimate images of a minor, regardless of whether the minor gave consent. Consent is irrelevant in these circumstances, as the law seeks to protect individuals under 16 from exploitation.
Examples of offences involving minors include:
Sending explicit images of a minor to others, which constitutes as child abuse material.
Posting or sharing intimate videos of someone under 16.
When defending against the offence of recording an intimate image without consent, you generally have two options; to plead guilty or to plead not guilty. Faraj Defence Lawyers can help you navigate either path with expert legal guidance.
If you choose to plead guilty, we will work to mitigate the penalties by presenting factors such as lack of malicious intent or evidence of remorse, potentially reducing your sentence or fines.
If you choose to not plead guilty, we will thoroughly examine the evidence, challenge the prosecution’s case, and explore possible defences, such as lack of intent, mistaken identity, or proving that consent was given.
With our expertise, we aim to achieve the most favourable outcome for your case.
If you decide to plead not guilty, Faraj Defence Lawyers will work diligently to build a strong defence strategy tailoured to your case. We will review the evidence carefully, look for any weaknesses or inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case. This includes examining whether the prosecution can prove each element of the offence, such as proving lack of consent or intent.
Our legal team will also explore possible defences, such as mistaken identity, lack of intent, or evidence of consent. Throughout the process, we will represent you in court, presenting your case persuasively and advocating for the best possible outcome.
If you decide to plead guilty, Faraj Defence Lawyers will work closely with you to achieve the best possible outcome. We will help gather character references and assist you in drafting apology letters to show remorse and a willingness to take responsibility of your actions. These can play a significant role in mitigating the sentence.
We will also engage in negotiations with the prosecution to potentially reduce charges or achieve more lenient terms. Our goal is to ensure that any penalties are as favourable as possible.
It is important to note that pleading guilty early can work in your favour, as it often leads to a more lenient sentence due to demonstrating cooperation with the legal process. We will guide you every step of the way to ensure the best possible outcome following conviction.
If you have been charged or accused of recording an intimate image without consent, it is crucial to seek immediate legal representation. These cases can carry serious penalties, including fines and imprisonment, and can have long-lasting impacts on your life and reputation.
Faraj Defence Lawyers are here to help. With our expert legal advice and extensive experience in defending these types of charges, we can carefully examine your case, explore all possible defences, and guide you through the legal process. Whether you choose to plead guilty or not guilty, we will work to secure the best possible outcome.
Free Consultation
Expert Defence Strategies
Unwavering Support and Guidance
Negotiation Expertise
Direct Access to Senior Criminal Lawyer
Fixed fees and transparent pricing
...so grateful for Ahmad he helped me out and got me out of a very sticky situation, absolute gun lawyer thank you!
Section 91P of Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Is a law that specifically addresses the offence of recording intimate images without consent. It makes it illegal to intentionally capture, distribute, or threaten or distribute images of a person engaged in private or intimate acts without their permission. These acts include nudity, sexual activity, or other situations where the individual would reasonably expect privacy. Key components of Section 91P include:
The recording or distribution must be done without the person’s consent.
The intent to case harm, distress, or embarrassment to the person is often a factor considered by the courts.
The maximum penalty for this offence is 3 years imprisonment. This law applies throughout NSW, and the severity of the penalty may depend on the circumstances of the case, such as the level of harm caused to the victim or whether the image was widely distributed.
Distribution of an intimate image refers to the act of sharing or making an intimate image available to others without the consent of the person depicted. This can occur through various channels, including digital platform and physical media. Examples of distribution include:
Sending the image via text messages or email to others.
Posting the image on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter.
Uploading the image to websites, chat grounds, or forums.
Sharing the image through messaging apps like WhatsApp or Snapchat.
Physically distributing printed copies of the intimate image.
The offence of recording an intimate image without consent can be heard in either the Local Court or the District Court, depending on several factors.
Factors that affect where the offence will be heard include:
The seriousness of the offence: More severe cases, such as those involving widespread distribution or malicious intent, are likely to be heard in the District Court, which has the authority to impose harsher penalties.
The circumstances of the case: if the case involves aggravating factors, such as a victim under 16 or repeated offences, it may be referred to the District Court.
The defendant’s plea: If the accused pleads guilty, the case may be dealt with in the Local Court, which generally handles less serious offences.
Remain calm, seek immediate legal advice before making any statements. This offence carries serious penalties, and a conviction could impact employment, relationships, and travel. If falsely accused, preserve any evidence that can support your case.
Yes, simply recording or possessing an intimate image without consent is an offence under section 91P of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). Sharing the image (distribution offence) carries even heavier penalties. Courts take a strict approach to privacy violations, and even accidental recordings can lead to criminal charges.
Not necessarily. Unlike child abuse material offences, recording intimidate images without consent does not automatically result in sex offender registration. However, in serious cases (e.g repeated offending or distribution), a court may impose sex offender conditions as part of sentencing.
Yes, first-time offenders may avoid jail if there are strong mitigating factors, such as remorse, cooperation, and no prior record. Courts often impose Conditional Release Orders, fines, or community service instead. However, repeat offenders or aggravated cases (e.g threats, blackmail) face harsh penalties, including imprisonment.
We look forward to helping you in your time of need and assisting you in achieving justice. We know how stressful these times can be therefore, your enquiry will be responded to within the same day.
